Originally Posted by
Adekis
They were criminals, but it wasn't their fault they blew up! They were targeted by other criminals. Are you positing a world in which Superman wouldn't save bank robbers from terrorists? Because I think that's pretty much what he's going for.
There's types of narrative logic wherein Superman might have written the Kroloteans off, and I would have accepted that if he had. In the ostensibly more simplistic Justice League Action for example, in Galaxy Jest he throws a bombfull of Joker-Gas into WarWorld. I doubt he knew for a fact that all the aliens would all survive the laughing gas, after all, it's extremely harmful and often lethal to humans, right? And for all we know, several of the gladiators did die. But crucially, I don't think it's a problem that Superman did so, because he meant to do it. He wrote off the gladiators as villains, decided it was okay to gas-bomb them, and then did it. The narrative supported his action. There's your "consequence free bubble", not in Superman's competence but in his morals. Golden Age Superman operated similarly - he'd toss criminals and spies off rooftops and such, and the narrative allowed him to do it without question because screw it, they're criminals and spies! There's definitely times when I think that's waaay better than the moralistic navel-gazing Superman stories often get sucked in to!
By contrast, in Young Justice's episode Alienated, he decided that the Kroloteans, despite their criminal actions, were people worth saving, and didn't have to navel-gaze to come to that conclusion but just went back to save them. This is where the "consequence free bubble" pops, and you're right to say that the more serious and empathetic methods of Young Justice set it apart largely for the better. All of which said, no amount of well-thought out ethics gives Superman a get-out-of-jail-free card for incompetence. To me it looks like you're the one trying to create a consequence free bubble for Superman's failure to pick a reasonable tactic to save the Krolotean criminals!
In terms of Superman's track record of course, I want to make clear that when Superman tries to do something with a reasonable tactic and fails, that's a different story to me. If Superman's trying to catch someone falling out of a building but he's too slow, or if he catches them and then they have a heart attack (an actual occurrence from the Golden Age), that's reasonable. If he tells them to flap their arms really hard and they hit the ground and die and the narrative treats it as a tragic failure instead of a farcical one, that's poor writing. And that's what happened in Alienated.