No problem, credit where credit is due!
People have made a connection between Jurgens recent tweet about being relieved when a very bad idea is fixed and made better (I'm very much paraphrasing), and the Oz situation. Knowing Jurgens style, and having a broad idea of the type of things he likes and the things he doesn't when it comes to the mythos, if he was referencing the Oz situation in any way, I do wonder if Johns meant Oz to be Jonathan Sr. but the direction was something that Jurgens felt in the long run hurt his legacy. Its hard to hurt legacies with "possible future"-like incarnations, but maybe he was supposed to be straight-up Jonathan.