I don't like this 'Watchmen sequel'. The ending was perfect. It should not have been touched. I was hoping that the Watchmen characters did not have the experiences of that book. They would be like new characters with no connections to the events of that book.
It sounds very interesting. So i won't judge it before hand. But it makes me anxious. This is one of the biggest Superman books in years. It has Superman meeting Watchmen. If it turns out bad it will be a letdown.
Speaking of Superman, i am having concerns. There are two worlds, and so many characters. For all of Johns' talk of Superman being the story i am worried.
Yes Embryonic Superman, that date can't be just a coincidence. Gary and Geoff are putting a lot of thought in the story. They are not simply copying the nine panel grid. I was looking at Superman sleeping with Lois in one panel. One fan pointed out that the panel resembles a Watchmen panel in very subtle ways. It may mean something.
They better give a good story as they say. Continuity correction shall play a very small role as Johns said. A good story with Superman can really be a shot in the arm of Superman. He is occupying very small piece in public mindspace. Even in a conference/interaction on a book which is supposed to be his story.
Let me have a guess. I have not read 'The Death of Superman' as well as the later stories upto his return. But i have heard a lot about his funeral. I have read that in that story all the heroes assembled from around the world. This must have been a highly publicized event. In a way this shows the legend of Superman. Of how Superman is the beacon to the world. Such an event can attract the attention of Dr. Manhattan.