Which arguably means that those characters and aspects, while possibly good, aren't integral to Batman at all.
Not really - the fact that so many Robins exist say that who is in the role is unimportant. It's just "younger kid sidekick" which isn't a great function, but yeah, old people can't function as young teen sidekick.And I think another poster, K. Jones, laid out earlier in this thread why characters like Alfred and Gordon (and Lucius, Vicki and Leslie) are kind of all interchangeable or can come and go in their functions while the Robin identity (especially Dick, but definitely all of them as a whole) have a function in the Bat-verse none of the others can replicate as easily as they do for each other.
True. But whether we ever get someone who can adapt a good Batman and Robin story and wants to is one of those things in the air - we've no control over that. For now, I'm just largely happy we've mostly gotten directors who can do Batman justice. Maybe some day Robin can be included, but as long Batman gets good movies I'm a happy fan.Agreed on this, I wouldn't want Reeves to be forced to use him if he doesn't have plans for him, and I also wouldn't want the studio to just have a puppet director who'd let them run all over them with most likely dodgy ideas. Or have a true "auteur" (ugh) who makes changes to the whole concept that it becomes unrecognizable. Some director has to be out there who can adapt and make a good story out of Batman and Robin and actively wants to, but then we have to factor in that they may not want to work with WB to begin with.