Originally Posted by
Darthkostis
I wouldn't say that Marvel has a wider range, and I say that as someone who's read Marvel stuff exlusively for the past 10 or so years. They've failed to put out Supernatural books time and time again, while they've also got a hard-on for changing the identities of their characters really often. Every Ghost Rider relaunch has featured a new Rider, with the book not getting past 12 issues nowadays. They have no detective or noir books, except Daredevil, which got turned into a silver-age super-hero book. Their cosmic line is a joke, with Bendis' GotG being one of the worst comics I've read. In general, while it may seem that Marvel's putting out a more diverse line-up, it basically comes down to two categories: Superhero titles, and indie-looking superhero titles like She-Hulk, Squire Girl and the like. Moon Knight is the exception rather than rule in this day and age. Heck, even Silver Surfer, which I loved, was basically the Matt Smith era of Doctor Who, just set in the Marvel Universe. Gone was the Surfer's philosophical self, gone was his immense power and stature. I read it and I really liked it, but I can't say that it was not a superhero title. Hickman's saga was great, but most didn't like it.
Am I excited for Black Panther and Moon Knight? Sure, but because they actually do look like they'll be more than just superhero titles (plus they're 2 of my favourite characters). But as it stands, I'm finding much more diversity and variety in DC's line-up than Marvel's. You've got teen books like Gotham Academy and We Are Robin, Supernatural books like Constantine, Indie-like books like Black Canary, and a whole slew of other stuff plus their classic super-hero stuff. Dunno why, maybe it's because I haven't read anything DC related in years so everything looks "fresh" to me, but I really do think that DC is mostly better than Marvel ATM.