It's relevant to the larger discussion of discrimination in both the Republican party and America in general.
Even more so than a singular study about a group of college students in Chicago.
And how you rarely address said discrimination directly and instead rely on data and talking points to avoid doing so.
I get that you are presenting "conservative" arguments but the reality is that most of us have already heard them before.
Again -- that's your option and it's a common technique but it's likely not going to progress the dialogue in any meaningful manner.
Safe to say claiming "it's wrong" and still supporting the party is not progress is the eyes of many.
Edit: I can admit my error in assuming most of us have already heard these arguments before -- it's not my place to make that assumption.
My goal isn't to impede dialogue but to have a more effective dialogue.