I agree!
My main issue with OMD is that it basically killed one of the aspects I loved more about the comics which was the possibility of reading AMS as if if it was the bibliography of Peter Parker. Seeing him graduate, working, move forward, marrying and so on.
When I started reading AMS, Peter was already married in the comics and it was really thrilling to know I would some day read all the previous stories that lead to that . There were some Dikto comics I had access to at the that time which was great. The 90s animated series also presented a Peter Parker way older than my 10 years old self and it didn't stop me from loving Spider-man. So at least to me having an aged Peter Parker was never an issue. I mean I loved JMS idea of having Peter working as a teacher and I was on high school at that time.
So I'm not a business man responsible for the spider-man brand. But clearly as a reader and a consumer I don't have the same motivation I had to read and spend money on this franchise. I would be completely ok if they gave an ending story for the Peter Parker created by Stan Lee and Dikto and rebooted the series with BND for a new 30 years long term story telling about Peter Parker. It could even start after a few years of him becoming Spider-man with some flashbacks and context on the past later on (as they did for the 90s animated series).
But as things are (the past counts/matters and doesn't count at the same time) they simply don't click for me. I just don't have the same commitment to the characters any more (Aunt May was dead. Now it's not. Aunt May knows Peter is Spider-man. Now she doesn't. He was married. Now he isn't...)
I know it's comics, it's different yada yada (not sure if OMD would be accepted in any other media or if by simply existing doesn't give room to mock comics and rolling eyes but that's another matter...) I particularly don't agree with that since I believe marvel was able to tell the slow pacing history of Peter Parker for 30 years (until the end of the clone saga and the first reboot that pissed me off on the "The gathering of five"). With a good writer and direction they could kept at it. But well this is just what I individually prefer as a reader and naturally it interferes with where I put my money and time on.