meh laura was ressurected so why wouldn't gaby??? and i don't really see logan caring about her. he's living his best summer life right now.
meh laura was ressurected so why wouldn't gaby??? and i don't really see logan caring about her. he's living his best summer life right now.
therein lies the dilemna. Based on current protocols, Laura was an exception. She died in service of Krakoa as she went on the mission, knowing chances were that she wasnt coming back. I dont think Xavier would have her go on that if he had no intention of bringing her back. Gabby introduces a new scenario which has not been dealt with yet and thats where the story lies
In other spoilers, we’re the 5 New Mutants about to have an orgy in that room on Mars?
That’s the subtext I got.
Last edited by Will Evans; 06-16-2021 at 10:07 AM.
Depends on in universe cut off for legal technicality; Laura was sex changed from her original genetic template, Gabby was a straight up clone (though an imperfect one.).
Given it was foreshadowed that she might not qualify for duplication, it will, at the bare minimum, be presented as a possibility that she won't be back.
P.S. Unrelated to that comment, but is it really that hard to remember Gabby was never actually an assassin that killed anybody?
Context is king.
X-23's most basic surface level characteristic that any idiot should grasp: Stoicism.
I don't demand that her every minor appearance be a nuance in-depth examination of her character, but is it to much to ask she be written in Archetype?! This is storytelling 101! If you want people to stay invested in a character, you need to, at the bare minimum, write them such a way that they can plausibly be believed to be the same character!
So….. is this supposed to insinuate that Thunderbird is still dead?
There are multiple genetic samples. If there werent, each mutant would only have 1 resurrection and several have already been brought back multiple times (I think Quentin has about 100). Even though it doesnt make sense, TPTB have said that John died before Cerebro was cataloging mutants. Thats there stance on it as of now
Context is king.
X-23's most basic surface level characteristic that any idiot should grasp: Stoicism.
I don't demand that her every minor appearance be a nuance in-depth examination of her character, but is it to much to ask she be written in Archetype?! This is storytelling 101! If you want people to stay invested in a character, you need to, at the bare minimum, write them such a way that they can plausibly be believed to be the same character!
Yo, holy fork, Karma was fire in this issue!
Then the handbook is wrong.. as he’s listed as a current member..
Then again, it also says Warlock is former (was this before they before everyone knew he was back?)
Also it uses that stupid ass Max Eisenhardt name for Magneto. That alone makes me question the whole book lol… (yes, I know, multiple writers, etc etc)