Ya, i don't think it did that.
Hmm, well i guess they did. There's quite a bit of holes to it, but ok. They kind of need to follow that up and explain some things then, otherwise i don't really see it holding up.
I haven't read the issue yet, but if this is true...
Dear, Cameron Stewart, Brenden Fletcher and Babs Tarr,
If you ever find yourself stuck on the roof of a building, and there is a demon there named "Gozer", and she asks if you are god...
YOU SAY: YES!
I have no problem with them retconning it, but it isn't the most elegant or clear way of doing it by just throwing in a panel of the Joker during an insane montage; because it has some other implications that they don't bother to address. How was Babs paralyzed then if it wasn't the Joker? Was Babs being paralyzed not real too? Even though most of this run has revolved around a neural implant that allows her to walk and some of the implications therein? If she was never paralyzed, was she never Oracle? There is a little more too it than just, Joker shooting her wasn't real, this is a major retcon that needs a bit more than a single panel's explanation.
As I said, I don't have a problem with them undoing it. I just think in their excitement to get from A to B, didn't really think through how they went about it, it's a bit hamfisted.
This does make me wonder how they're going to handle spoilers:end of spoilers, though.
the upcoming animated movie
Batgirl - ...BOP - Batman - 'Tec - Nightwing - Supergirl - Titans - Wonder Woman
What was the point? Why are they so smug about it?
Favorites: Batman, Superman, All-New Wolverine, Deathstroke, Detective Comics, Green Lanterns, Doom Patrol
Wow they just made thing more confusing