Originally Posted by
salarta
Most of the problem for comics and constantly keeping the old guard is because past constant use has set a precedent and expectations. I think I can make a comparison with game franchises, here.
Devil May Cry tried to shift away from Dante with Devil May Cry 4, and have new character Nero take up the franchise. However, fans were incredibly resistant to this because after 3 games, Dante was seen as the face of the franchise. He's "the star." They didn't like him being replaced by someone newer and younger. By contrast, the Final Fantasy franchise didn't stick with the same set of characters or even the same world for its sequels. Every main numbered installment is its own unique world with unique characters. Concepts and themes cross over, and since the late 90s/early 00s there's been sequels and side games with returning characters, but the main series is always new. And that doesn't cause backlash, because that precedent was set from the start. Though FF8 did have backlash, mostly because newcomers via FF7 didn't yet know how Final Fantasy does its sequels.
I can't say I "have the answer" to what X-Men comics should do about this issue. I think they're between a rock and a hard place. Decades worth of this precedent makes it harder to move away from it, and would seriously hurt sales, at the very least in the short term. At the same time, X-Men does have a big problem of being so wrapped up in its most heavily used and popular characters that they apply things to them that really don't fit, while ignoring less appreciated characters where those things actually apply. Like for example, what was done to Lorna in X-Factor #4 would've been far more appropriate coming from a character that was close to Rockslide than from Lorna. This is part of why I have the opinion that teams should really be a mix of more popular characters and less appreciated ones. The popular characters have recognition and status, the less appreciated ones bring new stories and become more well known.
But if Marvel were to seriously consider "retiring" older characters, then in my opinion, a couple things should be part of the planning. One, characters who haven't truly received the respect they should, deserve to get a spotlight before they're retired. Doesn't matter how old they are. Two, characters that have been "retired" should still show up for relevant stories. I'm thinking, for example, I wouldn't want Magneto, Jean, etc to be left out of stories where they're meaningful for Polaris just because they're retired. That prevents stories from truly being told. It would be in many ways just as bad as how Marvel ignores less appreciated characters when they have a stake in events.
She's a very visibly used character. That's not the same as leading.
Also what rhaenylis said. Lorna has maybe been good for X-Factor, because it can market off her image and use her to push other characters' stories forward. X-Factor has not been good for Lorna, because it's ignored her history and past development while holding her back as a team member on a smaller satellite book, unable to do or be anything more meaningful than that. Not even team leader.
Edit: On a related topic, I saw a lot of X-Factor fans on Twitter during the vote trying to argue that Lorna was either X-Factor's team leader or co-leader with Northstar. Which is false not just in how she's written, but even in interviews Williams explicitly said Lorna is not the team leader. She said Lorna is the "north star" of the team which some could interpret as leading the leader, but just reads to me like a nice way of saying "demoted to supporting character."