You talk about your opinion but I'm unclear about what it is. Are you skeptical of claims of fraud, or do you think the election was stolen?
The term "ignorant" isn't meant as a slur. It's objectively true. Pretty much everyone on the planet is ignorant about something. Ignorance can often lead to people being mistaken, as they make assumptions that have no basis in reality. This gets into the Dunning-Kruger effect, the way ordinary people with low ability will overestimate their own abilities at something because they don't have the framework and competence to understand it. It becomes easy for people who know a little bit about something to trick those who don't know as much, and this is something we should oppose.
Sometimes we will need emergency regulations. There are still procedures for putting those into place. There is a bad-faith argument from the left pushing for the permanent adoption of emergency regulations without ever making it clear that it was meant to be temporary, framing it as a matter of regression rather than as something that was successful and that should be made permanent (someone can make a good-faith argument that early voting or other emergency provisions worked well and should become part of the standard process going forward.) Bad-faith arguments on the left don't excuse bad-faith arguments on the right.
Braynard could always present his evidence, much of which wasn't based on restricted evidence. It is worth noting that more data has been released since then, for anyone to investigate whether there were shenanigans in the election.
As for technocrats and experts, these are the people who are supposed to evaluate complex systems. There are going to be plenty of right-wingers, who would have all the incentives in the world to expose massive election fraud. It would be very useful for the careers of many Republicans if they could prove that 50,000 votes in Georgia were manufactured.
The alternative to technocrats evaluating evidence is people who have no idea what the hell they're doing, like the Arizona state senate auditors checking ballots for bamboo fibers.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ots-audit-2020