I am trying to figure out what other people want, so this isn't necessarily about my own views.
There can be an argument that things that are obviously opinions do not need to be couched in skepticism, and that these are distinct from statements of fact.
A complicating factor is that there are some things that seem like they should be couched in skepticism that have been proven.
For example, LBJ won his first Senate race with the help of election fraud. Robert Caro got documentation from the last surviving official involved in the race.
https://archives.cjr.org/fiftieth_an.../caros_way.php
I'll note there are still some uncertainties (How much did LBJ know? Did his political opponent also cheat?) but it has been established that fraud helped a future Senate Majority Leader and President win a statewide race
It's helpful for discussions if facts that may seem controversial but are well-supported are treated differently from speculation.
It would be quite difficult to expect moderators to parse these differences.
Among other things, there are different understandings of best practices in 2021 than there were in 1968.
Who gets to make the distinction?
Sincerely,
Thomas Mets
A private organization like CBR can certainly have a ban on Holocaust denialism.
Making it illegal would be quite problematic as that power can set a precedent and be abused.
One of the reasons conspiracy theories are pernicious is that it can be difficult to prove a negative. How would one prove that the royal family didn't kill Princess Diana, or that Nike didn't pressure a sick Ronaldo to play in the 1998 world cup? Sometimes we have sufficient evidence to disprove a theory (Paul McCartney making music as a public figure counters the idea that he died in 1966), or it's built on something ridiculous and unproven (we would need to establish that aliens are real as the first step of understanding they run governments) but that isn't always the case.
I'll note that there are times left-wingers on the board have referred to conspiracy theories that were disproven or baseless. The justice department investigation indicated no evidence Mike Brown was trying to surrender when he was shot. Brett Kavanaugh did not run parties in Suburban Maryland in the 1980s in which multiple young women were habitually gang-raped.
I can understand a policy on banning discussion of disproven or baseless theories, although it can be hard for specialists to make that distinction, much less volunteer hobbyists.
Last edited by Mister Mets; 01-09-2022 at 06:02 AM.
Sincerely,
Thomas Mets
There is a very good chance that those things you dismiss as conspiracy theories on this thread will be proven true by the Jan 6 commission of legal proceedings resulting from it.
But good job on that strawman. It works so well I have not seen any crows on this thread in hours.
Fact is stranger than fiction. Liberals/Democrats/The Left rarely waste their time on creating Conspiracy theories about The Right/Conservatives/Republicans/Far-Right because they are doing a great job of making the bizarre all to real all on their own.
It's not that The Left are 'Pure of Heart', it's just that when the barrel is already filled to the brim, what sense does it make to add a few more drops? Besides, there is too much work to do to try and keep the US from falling apart.
Original join date: 11/23/2004
Eclectic Connoisseur of all things written, drawn, or imaginatively created.
Last edited by thwhtGuardian; 01-09-2022 at 09:14 AM.
Looking for a friendly place to discuss comic books? Try The Classic Comics Forum!
Looking for a friendly place to discuss comic books? Try The Classic Comics Forum!
First, there was plenty of abuse of free speech in East Germany.
However, there is a specific historical context to bans on Holocaust denialism in Germany, coming from the policy of Denazification in the aftermath of World War 2.
It's a different situation to create that kind of ban in the United States right now. Creating an exception to Freedom of Speech does allow people you don't like to create similar exceptions going forward.
* Edit- There were some ridiculous legal decisions.
The video game Wolfenstein was banned in Germany for twenty years because it includes Nazi imagery. It is a first person shooter in which Nazis are shot.
https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2018/...n-video-games/
The laws have also been used to prosecute anti-fascists who used Nazi imagery in ways that were directed against national-socialist endeavors. The courts eventually ruled in favor of the anti-fascists but it took a few years.
There have been weird stories that don't involve Naxi imagery. A comedian was prosecuted for mocking the President of Turkey.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...ish-president/
Because of America's robust freedom of speech, should Trump win again, we'll have a lot to worry about, but at least he and his next Attorney General won't have this tool to go after critics.
Last edited by Mister Mets; 01-09-2022 at 09:55 AM.
Sincerely,
Thomas Mets
Last edited by Jack Dracula; 01-09-2022 at 10:05 AM.
The Cover Contest Weekly Winners ThreadSo much winning!!
"When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis
“It’s your party and you can cry if you want to.” - Captain Europe
There came a time when the Old Gods died! The Brave died with the Cunning! The Noble perished locked in battle with unleashed Evil! It was the last day for them! An ancient era was passing in fiery holocaust!
I started to say that comparing conspiracy theories from the left and the right was a false equivalency, but then remembered how the fringe left is very similar to the right wrt to their ability to believe conspiracy theories about Democrats. For the most part, though, conspiracy theories that are believed in Democratic circles seem to be fewer and farther between than those believed by Republicans. It also seems like lower percentages of Democrats believe these concoctions than Republicans tend to. There are a few exceptions, however. The belief that Bush had something to do with the 9/11 attack comes to mind.
Pull List: Barbaric,DC Black Label,Dept. of Truth,Fire Power,Hellboy,Saga,Something is Killing the Children,Terryverse,Usagi Yojimbo.
East Germany?
Did it hurt to stretch that far?
Come on man, why not just say that your statement was wrong? That there hasn't been rampant misuse and repression of the people of Germany over banning the ability to publicly deny the Holocaust existed?
While it's true that I don't see similar bans being enacted here in the states any time soon, to pretend it hasn't worked elsewhere is just dishonest.
Last edited by thwhtGuardian; 01-09-2022 at 10:35 AM.
Looking for a friendly place to discuss comic books? Try The Classic Comics Forum!