Highly annoyed that Magneto is on that list. But the list doesn't make much sense anyway. Why would the New Mutants be there along with Dark Beast and others? Does Cyclops know there is a new Hell Fire Club? The Inner Circle should be on the list, but then I don't think Emma Frost and Mystique should be back in charge of a new Hell Fire Club. Maybe the X-Office had a change of heart about Emma and isn't driving so hard off the cliff with the character. That makes me happy too. But there is no list of "problems" of the X-Men that wouldn't contain the Hell Fire Club and Inner Circle.
But Magneto, why? Most of what he was doing the last few years was at Cyke's orders. The most recent bullsh*t with him attacking the HF buildings was manipulation by Emma and Briar Raleigh. How can Scott Summers think Magneto is a "problem" now? That's why I say, Cyclops seems like a brain-washed version of himself. And Logan wanting to kill everyone on the list, how does that correlate with his stance during "Schism"? The "list" seems like an editorially mandated swerve, and doesn't arise from any past stories or character story arcs. It doesn't even align with current X-books in the Age of X-Man world. The premise is that mutants are going extinct? Or that the X-Men as a cult are going to disappear? If the former, didn't Scott already deal with this regarding Utopia. If the latter, how does making a list of mutants who range from truly evil (Dark Beast) to anti-hero (Magneto) to former X-Men (New Mutants) and call them "problems" that need to be solved, do ANYTHING to restore the X-Men or create some kind of X-Men legacy? Think, writers, think. What can Scott Summers do that is POSITIVE to restore the X-Men legacy? You can't think of something between Xavier-zombie cult leader Scott and "Revolutionary" Scott? Defining others who you don't like as a "problem" that you have to "solve" is about as de-humanizing and fascistic as you can get. So Scott Summers has gone hard-right-wing now?
The X-Men legacy of narrow-mindedness, dualistic moralizing, defining mutants as either Xavier follower or "enemy" or the X-Men legacy of trying to help mutants whoever they are, whatever they look like, and help the public accept their mutant neighbors? (Remember the Morlocks in Claremont's era, confronting Xavier with the fact that all his early students looked "normal" while they had to hide underground and Xavier called them "villains.") Is this coming from the characters, or from reactionaries who work for Marvel, who want to go back to the 1960s, not the 1990s and now project their prejudices onto the Scott Summers?
I'm sorry, but this preview makes no sense. The story looks disconnected from the past 15 years, it looks mandated, it appears to be inconsistent with other books being published at the same time. The characters are OOC but worse, just so simplistic, caricatures of themselves. I don't get what Scott is doing, or what he believes. The character is so much better than this. He would NOT put Magneto, the New Mutants, the Morlocks, and others on a list. I can't see him making a list on a legal pad of "problems" like the editors at a Marvel Summit making a list on a legal pad of the story-arcs they're going to deal with. Maybe even in order.
From this preview, it looks to me like the X-Books are going down the rabbit hole again.