Originally Posted by
Jim Kelly
I considered this, but I could never come up with enough evidence to support that theory. And what defines the Bob Kane ghost style is the unique Bob Kane look--a certain naive quality to the art that is nevertheless appealing. All of the ghosts we know about were capable of doing more mainstream art--but deliberately evoked this weird quality to the art, so it would match with Bob Kane's style.
It's hard to imagine a scenario where some unknown artist constructed that style and then Bob had every other ghost copy it.
Maybe wanting it to be "Bill Finger and Bob Kane" is asking for too much. As far as I know, the Finger family now gets royalties. So I count that as a win. Maybe this is what Bob Kane was always afraid of and why he couldn't risk any kind of compromise, because he might lose everything if he gave an inch. And there was no guarantee that Finger would get anything. Given how D.C. was back then--knowing what they did to Siegel and Shuster--D.C. could have just cancelled Kane and Finger both.
One thing we do know is that Bob Kane had a lot of ambition. He was the driving force behind Batman's success. Bill Finger was easily taken advantage of by others and he wouldn't have fought for Batman the way that Bob Kane did. Bob kept Batman going for thirty years, he made the deals, he got others to work on the character for him. While he was clearly immoral, his selfish interests kept Batman going.
When I was a kid, I was very interested in the title logo for the Batman comics. Sometimes it said "Batman and Robin, the Boy Wonder" and sometimes it said "Batman with Robin, the Boy Wonder." I'd ponder for hours which was better. Is the conjunction "and" better than the preposition "with?" For me "with" had a lot more character and it didn't downgrade Robin at all--it actually made him more special.