I think scientist/inventor Superman is the solution to that aspect. If he is a scientist we could have stories in which he develops ways to circumvent the red sun issues and ways to be able to travel anywhere in the universe. That's why I think that aspects like his strength and invulnerability should be independent from the color of the sun he is under. So under a red sun he'd still be superhuman strong, durable and fast but couldn't fly.
It depends what you mean by yellow sun radiation or red sun radiation.
In the sun you have an enormous cascade of nuclear fusion going on for billions of years. The power of these heaveanly bodies is huge and at magnitudes far beyond what our mere science could create in anything like safe conditions. You'd have to be Gallifreyan to create a star-sun that you could use for your own personal whims.
Yet the way that your average crackpot scientist creates some red sun device to neutralize Superman, you'd think all it involved was putting a red lens over a flashlight.
I do think the red flashlights is all it takes in most comics these days. That's why synthetic Kryptonite makes more sense to imagine a villain creating, there's no hard science behind it.
Yeah. I think what weakens him is the wavelength of the light. In actuality red solar radiation (light) doesn't weakens Superman it just doesn't power him up. Under a red sun Superman slowly consumes the energy stored in his cells but the red solar radiation doesn't replenish it as efficiently as yellow solar radiation would. It is a weakness that doesn't make sense when he is on Earth.
I like Superman being as traditional as possible(without the heavy reimaginings of the post crisis era mainly), but not quite silver age either. My Superman is a man of two worlds but leans more toward human than Kryptonian since he experienced Earth culture directly growing up while Kryptonian culture was either learned through crystals and holograms or faint early childhood memories from before he was sent to Earth. He identifies as Clark Kent, but at the same time, he does pretend to be more timid than he really is to set himself apart from Superman. In a sense, his Clark is the person he might have been if he was really human and never had powers. Maybe he even had the "disguise" from a young age, like in Superboy comics.
As a person, he is very selfless and heroic, but not superhumanly so. He has moments of weakness and doesn't immediately have the answer to every problem. Still, I think what people perceive as unrealistically or unrelatably good is definitely achievable by real human beings, it just makes them feel bad because they don't do charity work or volunteer or go overseas and feed the hungry and build houses for the homeless and all that. Yeah, the average person is generally good in that they don't steal or kill or cheat but many are still relatively selfish and lazy, but that doesn't mean superheroes have to be.
I don't believe in the "there's always a way" mantra and believe there are occasions where Superman can't save everyone and some villains can only be stopped by killing them. I don't think Superman should resort to killing in his very first time out as Superman. At first, he can be the "there's always a way" guy who comes up with creative, non-violent solutions to problems but eventually, he'll reach his limits(with a villain like Doomsday, for example) and have to kill.
I don't think there's any problem with Superman being very powerful, as it's clear that characters such as the Hulk and Thor can be ridiculously powerful and still be popular and successful characters. I do believe most people actually enjoy ridiculous superhuman feats and don't pessimistically pick apart the physics of everything and complain about believability. As long as it's built up to properly, Superman can save the world by pushing it with his bare hands and it will be looked at as one of the greatest moments in cinematic history rather than an absurd, turn-your-brain-off, movie-killing moment. One of the main reasons people even like superheroes and sci-fi is because of larger than life characters and happenings that aren't possible in real life, like planet-sized space stations that can blow up other planets and ships that can travel several times the speed of light.
Anyway, power-wise, Superman's absolute muscle-tearing, back-breaking limit would be along the lines of moving the Earth, and it's not something he can normally do and takes an excruciating amount of effort that nearly kills him.
My Krypton and Fortress would be Donner-inspired to a certain extent, but Krypton wouldn't be an exact replica of the Donner version, though it would include crystalline buildings and terrain in the design(along with architecture inspired by the silver age and Byrne's designs, similar to the pre-Flashpoint Krypton). As part of Superman's origin, Clark would journey to the Arctic and throw a crystal into the ice which creates the fortress, where he communicates with a hologram of Jor-El, but not for 12 years as in the movie. The suit would either be a Kryptonian suit created by the fortress or he could return to Smallville where the Kents help him create a suit with his baby blankets.
I would probably return to the Pre-Crisis Origin for Superman and the pre-Crisis Kryton blowing up like it did with Jor'el sending him to earth. The Kents discovered his ship and took him home and raised him. He grew up with his powers developing earlier than post Crisis. He would not be as strong as he is today but he would have been the equivalent of himself at ten when he was ten. So he would be Superboy in Smallville. And I'd probably even give him powers when he was a baby. Ie the Kent would really have to keep an eye on him that he doesn't do something as a baby to reveal himself. Maybe he could jump like he did in his earlier Golden Age adventures before he could fly.
He would reveal himself to Lana Lang at some point and they were an item growing up. And they might even have become engaged at some point but it would have been called off for some reason. And eventually they would break up permanently and his leaving Smallville hurt her and she has possibly some anger toward him for it. But its not something they wouldn't be able to work through and remain friends.
Him being Superboy would open up the possibility of the Legion in the future. There would be no other Superboy if I was running things. Superboy would be what it always was in the past: The adventures of Superman as a boy. The thing that drives me nuts about DC is today they think everything has to happen on the same earth and at the same time... It doesn't.
Moving into Metropolis, the Daily Planet would be changed to an online publication that people pay for access too like most newspapers today. Perhaps there is also still a print version as well. Lois Lane would be the one to get the first story of Superman's move to Metropolis. How? By him saving her such as the airplane route that was used in I believe Man of Steel. I might be misremembering that.
Lex Luthor would be the genius businessman of the post-Crisis era and his business was built on his scientific creations. Only he would be younger more like his discovered post-Crisis "son" (when he cloned himself when he was dying). He would hate Superman because he is an alien and consider him a threat to humanity and the world. He would make it his life's work to end Superman. No matter what good Superman does, he would find a reason to see it as a threat.
Powerwise, Superman would be like the Silver Age in power. He would be able to travel in time if he wanted. And he would be a genius.
His suit would not be changed from what it was in before nu52 and preferrably a return to the 86 suit or 2003 suit since those were my favorite suits. Anyone who thinks the costume is cheezy is free to head off to another Superhero. :P
I agree. While villains who can be a match for Superman physically are a must and provide great spectacle, I think the greatest challenges the Man of Steel can face are the ones you mention. As for the relationship between Lex and Clark, Waid portrayed beautifully in Birthright, and it indeed adds a layer to their conflict.
Thanks. I agree, I wouldn't deviate too much form the basic "structure" of the suit. But I imagine it should reunite both the "alien" and "God" characteristics. Also, why just one suit, right? I liked that Action Comics variant cover in which Supes is in front of a wardrobe at his fortress trying to choose what to wear. Kryptonian culture is a rich one, and it should show.
Well, I think that the existence of another Kryptonian, regardless of when he/she shows up, does make Supes a bit less special. But I'm guessing that's just me.
And seeing him defined by his relationships is an interesting angle. Who would you do it? From those characters POV perhaps?
You have some interesting ideas here. Hadn't thought about a close friendship between Kal and John Stewart, guy Gardner and Visen, of all people. Also, Zatanna? Never thought of that one either. Where did that come from?
And yes, cosmic adventures FTW! Weird planets, dimensions, meeting (and/ or fighting) unknown alien species. I miss that from the comics.
Dude, you practically wrote a fanfic here! Interesting stuff, well thought. Seems you got all the basics covered. I like that twist on the Clark-Lex relationship, and the new characters in Smallville. Just out of curiosity: why the change in the Kent family?
Man, I've been clamoring for a lot of this stuff for years. We actually share quite a few things on how we'd tackle the character. I like the "enemy classification" you came up with. I think it's spot on. Same with Superman's power levels. He should be the most powerful, period. I, too, hate the "I'm as powerful as Superman" CRAP. Also, interesting take on the CK persona. It makes sense.
AND I also agree on those first two paragraphs. I mean, he's NOT human. I understand that with that comment people try to emphasize his human side, so he doesn't appear "unrelatable". But I could relate to Kal-El: he has feelings that can be tested. He feels joy, sorrow, anger, et cetera just like we do. And isn't that what "humanity" truly means?
I dunno. Why not Zatanna? She's fun, quirky and dramaless compared to any others. Also feel that John and Clark would have a lot in common. Guy would be that horndog friend that we all have and Vixen is just awesome.
Yeah we need more zany cosmic adventures. Just imagine Guy and Superman in a random planet full of blobs trying to help them against some wolf like villain with a mustache.
If I'm to be honest, I wouldn't mind changes in the costume, the powers, the job situation--if they just kept some of the past stories in continuity.
Obviously, comic book time being what it is, what happened in 1930 or 1970 has to be updated so it happened five or ten years ago--but I like to think that at any moment an old story from long ago can be referred back to or some old character can return--without a lot of reboots and retcons.
For example, in ADVENTURE COMICS No. 216 (September '55), Bill Finger wrote "The Wizard City." Then in ACTION COMICS No. 565 (March '85), Mort Todd wrote "The Wizard City Warrior." In the thirty years between these two stories, Wizard City was never even mentioned. But because of the open door policy toward continuity (pre-Crisis), Wizard City could just show up thirty years later.
And not just pre-Crisis was this possible. In THE POWER COMPANY (circa 2002), Kurt Busiek made use of Carl Andrew Bork, whose only other appearance before then was more than thirty years earlier in a Batman and Flash team-up, "But Bork Can Hurt You," in THE BRAVE AND THE BOLD No. 81 (December '68 - January '69).