I don't see that. I see more understanding for Ed, its way too superficial to even bash him because Ed does have a great body of work as an actor, His take on the hulk feels very believable , honest and earned especially when he is not the first person to say marvel movies are poorly scripted. Happy on other comments like youtube most are calling him the best Hulk and agreeing with him.
Are u reading the same thread? Theres like one poster that says anything positive. Me,Dr Newgod,Joker,Zero all comment on Norton being notoriously difficult nd hard to work for. And now your talking about YouTube. What on YouTube? A video about Norton being a better Banner? Norton is a good actor but doesnt mean anything. He was set up to get his biggest payday ever but he talked his way out of the role. Now Ruffalo is making more money then Norton can dream of and getting critical and fan praise. Norton sounds salty to me
I remember always liking Norton's Banner. I actually thought he was the definitive. That said, like others have said, he's known for being a pain sooo...who cares? Ruffalo was there to collect.
He may have legitimate complaints as did Mickey Rourke although I'm tempted to say, What did Rourke want? They gave him his stock crying scene? In fact, Jon Favreau seems to have felt he was bending over to accommodate Rourke. So some of it is point of view. I don't want to say that either Rourke or Norton has an exaggerated since of self-importance but, sometimes, on a big movie like that with a big paycheck, it's probably better to just accept that that's exactly what it is for certain actors- a paycheck.
I like Ruffalo's Banner but the big reason people like it is because it's a comedy routine. Norton's is closer to the comic character.
I've thought all the live action versions of Banner were performed by very good actors but, in terms of closeness to the comic book version:
Bana > Norton > Bixby > Ruffalo.
Power with Girl is better.
Norton does have a bit of a difficult reputation as others have mentioned.
That said, I do kind of feel for him and Mickey Rourke. Watching Ed on some of the behind-the-scenes stuff on TIH, you can really tell he was invested in the project and the character. Even when Ruffalo came out at ComicCon back in 2012, Norton was fairly classy and wrote a nice thank-you letter to the fans who were pushing for him to be in Avengers.
And IIRC, Mickey did some crazy method acting to prepare for Iron Man 2; actually learning to speak Russian, spending time in a Russian prison including getting authentic Russian prison tattoos. Maybe he saw it as a big break, like Iron Man was for RDJ, but they ended up nixing some ideas he had to make Vanko more three-dimensional.
I still enjoyed his performance, but if he put that much into the role only to be disappointed by executive meddling and/or Iron Man 2 script issues (it’s the one MCU film where they were clearly scrambling to cash in on IM1’s success as quickly as possible) then I can’t really blame him for his bitterness.
EDIT: After writing all that, it really appears that the cost of Marvel’s creative control has pushed out some of their more free spirits. Norton and Rourke probably belong in the same boat as Patty Jenkins and Edgar Wright and the rest of their ilk.
Last edited by Harbinger19; 07-16-2018 at 10:26 PM.
"What I sought, I could not obtain."
"This is a meaningless battle. We are two madmen engaging in senseless folley."
"I will kill, I will let live..."
--Genuine Fake Priest Kotomine Kirei
Tbh I don't think Norton or Ruffalo made for very good Banners.
It’s been 10 years and he’s still whining about it?
I'd say Norton was the better actor, but Ruffalo is by far the more entertaining Banner.
I like Ruffalo's Banner; with Norton's I was more, I get it, you're angsty and intense, get green already you sourpuss.
I do wonder what Norton's Hulk would have been like. Ruffalo is the first actor to play both Banner and the Hulk.
I'm surprised more actors don't demand better scripts. Almost every Marvel movie is crap.