Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 54
  1. #16
    Amazing Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    33

    Default

    The shift towards more vivid and deeper coloring in the past 20 years or so is actually contributed a lot to me getting into comics in the first place. Glad to see colorists FINALLY getting their due.

  2. #17
    Nostalgia Fanwanker Pharozonk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    4,212

    Default

    Well done DC!

    Wow, that may be the first positive thing I've said about them for a while now...
    "In any time, there will always be a need for heroes." - the Time Trapper, Legion of Superheroes #61(1994)

    "What can I say? I guess I outgrew maturity.." - Bob Chipman

  3. #18
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    125

    Default

    Right on Dc! Give those colorists their well deserved credit

  4. #19
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Global
    Posts
    6,779

    Default

    Good move by DC, in a time where most companies are getting greedier, this is good.

  5. #20
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    2,613

    Default

    Good news all around.

  6. #21
    Ultimate Member Sacred Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    18,725

    Default

    Nice. Great for the creators, possibly better for fans too if this could result in a better working environment resulting in less walk outs and better output.

  7. #22
    ♥♥عابث سولاناس♥♥ Park Slope Pixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    3,027

    Default

    Nice work, DC.

  8. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sacred Knight View Post
    Nice. Great for the creators, possibly better for fans too if this could result in a better working environment resulting in less walk outs and better output.
    Yeah, good all around for everyone. I don't generally get upset with DC for what they do or don't do with the fictional characters that they own -- because it's the real people, past and present, that work at DC that really matter.

    So, good on DC for updating the creator payment plan and giving some love to the colorists.

  9. #24
    Ultimate Member Robotman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    California
    Posts
    12,130

    Default

    Great news. Glad they came around.

  10. #25
    Astonishing Member The_Greatest_Username's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Alabama :(
    Posts
    3,682

    Default

    This is great news. Good job, DC! Keep up the excellent work, colorists.

  11. #26
    All-New Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3

    Default

    they were following a 30 year old model??? Holy crap. Talk about no advancement in an industry towards its employees.

    I literally laughed out loud when I read they are finally offering direct deposit.

  12. #27
    All-New Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    3

    Default

    It could depend on the percentages (if the royalty shares are made much higher than what I'm guessing they used to be -- never seen a DC wfh contract), but royalties being based on net instead of on cover price is actually worse for the creators -- they are most likely going to make less now. Colorist credit is good, of course; grouping royalty escalator thresholds could possibly be good, possibly be bad, depending on the actual royalty rates and how fast certain formats were escalating vs the other formats. But the major news here to me is the switch from cover price to net, and that's not great...

  13. #28
    Astonishing Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3,044

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GLFan5994 View Post
    Agreed on the colorists.

    It is hard to believe digital first comic creators were paid at a flat rate. That is seriously uncool.
    I can understand that at first--because no one knew how they were going to sell.

    It could depend on the percentages (if the royalty shares are made much higher than what I'm guessing they used to be -- never seen a DC wfh contract), but royalties being based on net instead of on cover price is actually worse for the creators -- they are most likely going to make less now. Colorist credit is good, of course; grouping royalty escalator thresholds could possibly be good, possibly be bad, depending on the actual royalty rates and how fast certain formats were escalating vs the other formats. But the major news here to me is the switch from cover price to net, and that's not great...
    So as a result of this, could we see a result of less top flight creators being willing to work on B and C Level books?

  14. #29
    Extraordinary Member Prime's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    5,052

    Default

    Good.

    10 characters

  15. #30
    All-New Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by titanfan View Post
    So as a result of this, could we see a result of less top flight creators being willing to work on B and C Level books?
    That's an interesting idea; another possibility is that, because they are most likely going to make less money from royalties across the board, top flight creators may want to take on more books, even lower tier? I don't know -- it's possible that whatever we're meaning by "top flight creators" are doing well enough to be beyond that type of consideration.

    I should clarify, I don't know what DC's old or new contracts look like, or have any inside information -- I work in book publishing. It's entirely possible that DC accountants could whip up proof in a few minutes that this will benefit creators. But from that letter, it sounds to me like less money going to creators, and with it seems like everyone praising DC (mostly rightly -- there are good developments here, too, and the tone of the letter is "this is good for everyone!"), I just wanted to point that out...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •