Its not about things being different. It's about changing the fundamental nature of a character because, Hollywood. The point is Drax in the movies (and by extension how he now appears in the comics) is NOT the same Drax who's been around since the mid 70's. That's part of my problem with Hollywood. Its not changing stories or minor details, but the fundamental background of a character should be off limits.
They did the same thing to Peter Quill and then Scott Lang. Worse, those attributes have now been carried over to the books. I liked GOTG when it was Quill's paramilitary force for protecting the galaxy (as shown in Earth's Mightiest Heroes). Not the bunch of clowns thats in Avengers Assemble.
I can't sit through SS and I'm getting in on cable instead of being a captive audience in movie theater. I find the Thor movies pretty competently made...not great but very entertaining to me. I'm surprised they've done as well with Thor as they have because I thought he'd be too corny for movies.
Drax was also quite intelligent until his daughter fried his brain in the early 80's. At least when he was resurrected as an idiot, they explained WHY his intelligence was so poor, because of what Moondragon had done to him previously. It was a significant plot point of Infinity Watch, because Drax didn't remember but the others did.
Dboi2001 :
go and create Your movie if this is so easyI'm fine with changes but Marvel just changes them usually to appeal to the lowest common denominator. There is no reason comic Star Lord couldn't have worked and they had to make him a man child space marauder
changing mantis or drax ? (but people like drax, i don't know about mantis)How does Fox apparently make things worse?
or
changing Rogue and Cyclops?(and people didn't like X3 for example)
Punjabi_Hitman:
It would be better to look differently at box officeTransformers franchise and Avatar have made more money than any Marvel movie yet they just as bad or worse than Thor 2. Yet these movies made far more money than Marvel?
If you look at the gross of the first four Marvel movies vs the first four X-Men or DC movies,
box office + ratings
healthy franchise should look like GotG - GotG 2 earned more than GotG1
Avengers 2 earned less which is bad.
X-men are worse
they were earning more and more up to X3(and people didn't like this movie)
then FC earned very little
DOFP earned a lot
Apo again earned very little
that's not good. If X-men would have good movies then they would earn at least 750 millions (DOFP level). For some reason even people who like X-men movies don;t want to go to the cinema to watch their movies.
Personally i think that's because they have stories about 3 white old guys. and they also have very generic stories. nothing unique about them(apocalypse).
harry potter = good franchise because more and more people was watching these movies.
transformers = they were good (first movies) and have problems now (last 2 movies).
what about year of release?Then what are we complaining about? That lower rated movies are out grossing higher rated movies?
Do You know that more people watched first X-men trilogy than second? (US)
X-men second trilogy earned more thanks to inflation.
Last edited by Xelossik; 06-27-2017 at 12:01 PM.
Marvel Studios did wrong to Mantis. They gave her name to a pretty much unrelated character in GotG2.
Ever since MS got a fragment of the cosmic cube things have changed.
i know i participated but, honestly, is this a real conversation?
some people like things other people don't like. Stop the presses.