The problem is that this is an established continuity. If this were a stand-alone creator project then it wouldn't be an issue. But when you have so many long-standing people/ways that could easily fix that problem, then you have to give a darn good explanation for why they don't explore those. If you have to flat-out ignore/contradict such options just to make your premise work, then your premise was flawed from the beginning. That's the price you pay for writing in such a long-standing established continuity.
I disagree. I understand it ignores established continuity. But I think in this case, the established continuity isn't worth incorporating. I don't really like characters who can heal others, especially given that super heroes are already ridiculously resilient. And especially when said healers exist solely to heal the super heroes, and their abilities are never examined much beyond that.
I prefer the writer to go with his approach, because I think his is the stronger of the two options.
I don't consider simply adhering to continuity to be the major criteria for solid writing. It can play a part, yes, but it is not the end all be all.
WHY does larocca INSIST on drawing rogue like some sloppy stray dog??
It is poor writing wheb it is ignored by people that have esxtensicve worked with those same healers and who are complain that there is no fix availble, The fix would be obovieous to everyone in that room immediately re even the most dim-witted. This story is set in a universe where healers are a normal thing for Super-heroes and Mutants to deal with, not doing so just makes the characters fools
I don't recall ever seeing Wanda drink..even in Wedding issues.