yeah it feels like propaganda, many who favour stand alone movies which means rogue not having to be in CM 2 are quickly called been anti-avengers because avengers is the ultimate crossover connect 4 movies, but for some of us, that is not our thing. X-Men also has been written best to be it's own universe moslty.
With the rogue absorbing carol thing , I saw that more as a
freak accident than a daily xmen event.
Yeah he was but I never cared much for him.
And that is your prerogative, but this is an xmen forum though,
not only that X-Men along with spiderman if you remove them from marvel they can function well even better away from that marvel , they don't need MCU. that is why most of us find their worlds the most interesting.
for xmen , it's deeper than under 3 hour movies that is charmed soley on movie crossovers between characters like rogue and carol, which is the defining thing for Avengers/GOTG but for xmen is about 70 years of great mythological world building of the series that extend to comics, books, video games and cartoons and social commentary.
The Avengers/GOTG stuff brought into xmen for many xmen fans is diluting a lot only because of movies , and that is bad.
Carol does not need rogue, at this point from a comic book movie POV. Rogue showing up only to absorb carol in Capitan marvel 2 wont be anything new. Rogue's storyline in X-Men 1 will age better than that because that is a comic book character who was written as a human character, not an action figure.