Or are they equally as bad?
I, personally prefer the latter. I like seeing guys like Channing Tatum be there 100% and be very passionate about what role they're playing. Good actors phoning it in becomes more distracting.
Or are they equally as bad?
I, personally prefer the latter. I like seeing guys like Channing Tatum be there 100% and be very passionate about what role they're playing. Good actors phoning it in becomes more distracting.
The latter. It’s so dull watching an actor halfass a role for a paycheck.
Really depends, on how bad the lesser actor is. If were talking Channing Tatum then I'd take the lesser actor but if we get to bad actor territory I'd prefer the good actor phoning it in. But also some actors are just fun no matter what. Will Smith can just be WILL Smith and still carry a movie.
Honestly it's only kinda good actor I think of phoning it in. Like Bruce Willis. People like Deniro and Denzel have been in BAD movie but they always seem to be trying.
Depends on the actors.
Denzel phoning it in is better than several other actors. Reese Witherspoon phoning it in is better than a lot of actresses.
Depends on the movie. If a good actor knows the movie they are in is crap then their half-assed acting can be entertaining in it's own right.
It's excruciatingly PAINFUL to watch a no talent actor/actress with a lot of energy attempt at emoting. So nope i prefer a half-ass effort from a good actor phoning it than a lesser actor/actress who can't make me believe whatever they are trying to convey.
Tatum always makes me cringe.
Last edited by Tofali; 04-16-2018 at 04:17 AM.
What really is a phoned in performance? I looked up online. And according to this explanation a phoned in performance can't ever be good to watch.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/discussio...yy8jic8qvmr731
I thought Tatum was good in the Jump Street films. They were no award winning performances. But they were quite entertaining to watch.
Last edited by Soubhagya; 04-16-2018 at 05:59 AM.