Results 1 to 15 of 29

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Peter Scott SpiderClops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,567

    Default What Do You Prefer: Good Actor Phoning It In OR Lesser Actor giving 100%

    Or are they equally as bad?

    I, personally prefer the latter. I like seeing guys like Channing Tatum be there 100% and be very passionate about what role they're playing. Good actors phoning it in becomes more distracting.

  2. #2
    Northern Lights Beaubier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    2,896

    Default

    The latter. It’s so dull watching an actor halfass a role for a paycheck.

  3. #3
    King of Wakanda Midvillian1322's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    9,448

    Default

    Really depends, on how bad the lesser actor is. If were talking Channing Tatum then I'd take the lesser actor but if we get to bad actor territory I'd prefer the good actor phoning it in. But also some actors are just fun no matter what. Will Smith can just be WILL Smith and still carry a movie.

    Honestly it's only kinda good actor I think of phoning it in. Like Bruce Willis. People like Deniro and Denzel have been in BAD movie but they always seem to be trying.

  4. #4
    Astonishing Member Vinsanity's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,453

    Default

    Depends on the actors.

    Denzel phoning it in is better than several other actors. Reese Witherspoon phoning it in is better than a lot of actresses.

  5. #5
    Put a smile on that face Immortal Weapon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Bronx, New York
    Posts
    14,064

    Default

    Depends on the movie. If a good actor knows the movie they are in is crap then their half-assed acting can be entertaining in it's own right.

  6. #6
    Niffleheim
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    9,787

    Default

    It's excruciatingly PAINFUL to watch a no talent actor/actress with a lot of energy attempt at emoting. So nope i prefer a half-ass effort from a good actor phoning it than a lesser actor/actress who can't make me believe whatever they are trying to convey.

    Tatum always makes me cringe.
    Last edited by Tofali; 04-16-2018 at 04:17 AM.

  7. #7
    Astonishing Member Soubhagya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,470

    Default

    What really is a phoned in performance? I looked up online. And according to this explanation a phoned in performance can't ever be good to watch.

    http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/discussio...yy8jic8qvmr731


    Quote Originally Posted by Ralmist View Post
    Tatum always makes me cringe.
    I thought Tatum was good in the Jump Street films. They were no award winning performances. But they were quite entertaining to watch.
    Last edited by Soubhagya; 04-16-2018 at 05:59 AM.

  8. #8
    Jubilant Member Dementia5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Canadia
    Posts
    3,282

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beaubier View Post
    The latter. It’s so dull watching an actor halfass a role for a paycheck.
    Absolutely this. If the actor isn’t interested then why should I be?
    Quote Originally Posted by Fokken View Post
    Yer bonkers and you need a sandwich.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •