Originally Posted by
chief12d
I think the crucial difference here is that unlike Stark or Rogers, T’Challa’s story is incomplete. The first film clearly set up relevant plots relating to T’Challa’s inner turmoil to be a good man or good king, the ramifications of revealing Wakanda, his romance with Nakia, etc. That’s not even getting into the likely roles he would’ve had in being a leading Avenger, member of the Illuminati, and his inevitable rivalry with other Marvel kings like Namor and Doctor Doom.
His was a story that like Thor’s was supposed to stretch the span of a decade, or at least close to it. Boseman’s passing is tragic but I think Marvel would be doing a disservice to the character of T’Challa and his millions of fans if they shafted these stories and elevated Shuri to the throne. Especially when it’s clear she’s not ready yet. Short of a retcon that reveals she was in fact alive and training during those 5 years, there’s little to no evidence that Shuri has what it takes to be the fighter the mantle demands her to be. It simply doesn’t make narrative sense for her to be Black Panther without radically altering what it’s supposed to be about.
I think Shuri deserves her time. But like Falcon, Ironheart, and Jane-Thor, she should wait for the originator of the mantle to get his dues on the big screen. T’Challa (not Shuri) is the first major black superhero in comics. He’s the dude that held the title for literal decades and is leading the current Avengers. He’s the one that was part of one of the greatest Marvel events in history, Secret Wars. He’s worth recasting to get the full breadth of his character and then Shuri can take the foundation he established and go her own way. I’m all for evolving the MCU, but only if the original characters get their stories told to their conclusion.