No where did I state that Wakanda never had problems.
This is what I said "
A fictional super advanced country that never had the foundational problems of a real one, can't have the problems of a real country. A lot of African countries problems come directly from colonialism and the borderline insane drawing of borders". This isn't complicated.
Coates directly transplanted the problems of [I]some[/I ]real-life African countries onto Wakanda and that doesn't make sense. It's pretty straightforward to be honest. Wakanda's existence doesn't really parallel any African country (or any country in the world for that matter), so Coates digging out problems from countries that in geography don't even reflect African history is
idiotic. I repeat, a lot of Africa's problems come directly from colonialism and how their borders were drawn, how tribes were put together without any rhyme and reason and how their resources were plundered. In which reality does any of this apply to Wakanda?
Even if one wants to apply real world to Wakanda, using the worst stereotypical portrayal of Africans is seriously problematic. It's basically saying that no matter how rich or successful they are, this is what they turn into during conflict. This is regurgitating the white supremacist argument (in a different form) that suggests that black people are inherently violent and criminal.
Different countries have different problems, it's up to the writer to get creative and apply more appropriate problems (and solutions) to Wakanda. Priest did this, even McGregor did this, but it never got to the arrant nonsense that we got under Coates and Ridley. If we suddenly saw "Rape Camps" in Asgard, folks will be confused as to why this is happening because it doesn't make sense.
Storytelling needs to make sense regardless of the medium.